[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: cost of popen()
From: |
Shigio Yamaguchi |
Subject: |
Re: cost of popen() |
Date: |
Sat, 18 Jun 2005 08:52:18 +0900 |
> > To solve the problem, we should move the interface from the command layer
> > to the function layer, that is, links gtags-parser as part of gtags.
>
> Does this mean stopping supporting plug-in parser?
Yes, it does.
Though plug-in parser in command layer is worthy in the flexibility,
I have not heard someone make it. If it is not necessary, should we
take rather the performance than the needless flexibility?
--
Shigio YAMAGUCHI <address@hidden> - Tama Communications Corporation
PGP fingerprint: D1CB 0B89 B346 4AB6 5663 C4B6 3CA5 BBB3 57BE DDA3
- cost of popen(), Hideki IWAMOTO, 2005/06/15
- Re: cost of popen(), Shigio Yamaguchi, 2005/06/15
- Re: cost of popen(), Hideki IWAMOTO, 2005/06/16
- Re: cost of popen(), Shigio Yamaguchi, 2005/06/16
- Re: cost of popen(), Shigio Yamaguchi, 2005/06/17
- Re: cost of popen(), Hideki IWAMOTO, 2005/06/17
- Re: cost of popen(),
Shigio Yamaguchi <=
- Re: cost of popen(), Hideki IWAMOTO, 2005/06/17
- Re: cost of popen(), Shigio Yamaguchi, 2005/06/17
- Re: cost of popen(), Hideki IWAMOTO, 2005/06/19
- Re: cost of popen(), Hideki IWAMOTO, 2005/06/19
- Re: cost of popen(), Shigio Yamaguchi, 2005/06/19