[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: cost of popen()
|
From: |
Shigio Yamaguchi |
|
Subject: |
Re: cost of popen() |
|
Date: |
Fri, 19 Aug 2005 11:53:20 +0900 |
> Would you add built-in parser to plans.html, in order to clarify
> the priority of built-in parser?
OK. I have added the plan at the tail of the list.
> I think that the first purpose of using built-in parser is reducing
> reading GTAGS from defined(). Is this right?
No, it is not only that. I would like to make gtags simpler.
I will write the proposal for it in near future.
--
Shigio YAMAGUCHI <address@hidden> - Tama Communications Corporation
PGP fingerprint: D1CB 0B89 B346 4AB6 5663 C4B6 3CA5 BBB3 57BE DDA3