[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Post-it project (Re: Feature suggestion)
From: |
Rob Holland |
Subject: |
Re: Post-it project (Re: Feature suggestion) |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Oct 2005 16:05:30 +0100 |
First draft of a spec attached. Glosses over directory structure (we
agree here anyway and it isn't complicated).
It lacks: details of locking for working on the notes file (exclusive
lock on notefile.lock before writing..?) and details of how regex might
work. I assume we want this...
"Give me all notes relating to str* on this file".
It doesn't discuss how we know where the source and notes directories
are (again a small issue).
I've avoided the term post-it as I fear trademarks ;)
I don't see any obvious pitfalls with the spec yet.
Let me know what you think. I'm happy to knock up a proof of concept
once we're happy with the spec.
Cheers,
Rob
--
Rob Holland Inverse Path Ltd
Chief R & D Engineer -----> <--------
<address@hidden> http://www.inversepath.com
0xD91B4729 5251 4FAC D684 8845 5604 E44F D65C 392F D91B 4729
README
Description: Text Data
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- Re: Feature suggestion, Shigio Yamaguchi, 2005/10/11
- Re: Feature suggestion, Rob Holland, 2005/10/11
- Re: Feature suggestion, Shigio Yamaguchi, 2005/10/11
- Re: Feature suggestion, Rob Holland, 2005/10/11
- Post-it project (Re: Feature suggestion), Shigio Yamaguchi, 2005/10/12
- Re: Post-it project (Re: Feature suggestion), Rob Holland, 2005/10/12
- Re: Post-it project (Re: Feature suggestion), Shigio Yamaguchi, 2005/10/12
- Re: Post-it project (Re: Feature suggestion), Rob Holland, 2005/10/12
- Re: Post-it project (Re: Feature suggestion),
Rob Holland <=
- Re: Post-it project (Re: Feature suggestion), Shigio Yamaguchi, 2005/10/12