[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[RFC] Treatment of symbolic link
From: |
Shigio YAMAGUCHI |
Subject: |
[RFC] Treatment of symbolic link |
Date: |
Sun, 13 Jan 2008 19:19:13 +0900 |
How about changing the specification of directory traverse with symbolic link?
1. Current Specification
Synbolic link which points to a directory is ignored.
% gtags
% global -x main
main 4 a/main.c main(int argc, char *argv[])
% ln -s a b
% gtags
Warning: './b' is a directory. (Ignored)
Warning: './b' is a directory. (Ignored)
Warning: './b' is a directory. (Ignored)
% global -x main
main 4 a/main.c main(int argc, char *argv[])
2. New Specification
Synbolic link which points to a directory is accepted.
% gtags
% global -x main
main 4 a/main.c main(int argc, char *argv[])
% ln -s a b
% gtags
% global -x main
main 4 a/main.c main(int argc, char *argv[])
main 4 b/main.c main(int argc, char *argv[])
Though I do not remember why to have made it to such a specification,
maybe it was to avoid parsing a file many times.
Anyway, I think it is bad specification or a bug.
--
Shigio Yamaguchi <address@hidden> - Tama Communications Corporation
PGP fingerprint: D1CB 0B89 B346 4AB6 5663 C4B6 3CA5 BBB3 57BE DDA3
- [RFC] Treatment of symbolic link,
Shigio YAMAGUCHI <=
- Re: [RFC] Treatment of symbolic link, Jean-Marc Saffroy, 2008/01/14
- Re: [RFC] Treatment of symbolic link, Shigio YAMAGUCHI, 2008/01/14
- Re: [RFC] Treatment of symbolic link, Jean-Marc Saffroy, 2008/01/14
- Re: [RFC] Treatment of symbolic link, Shigio YAMAGUCHI, 2008/01/14
- Re: [RFC] Treatment of symbolic link, Hideki IWAMOTO, 2008/01/15
- Re: [RFC] Treatment of symbolic link, Shigio YAMAGUCHI, 2008/01/15
- Re: [RFC] Treatment of symbolic link, Hideki IWAMOTO, 2008/01/15
- Re: [RFC] Treatment of symbolic link, Shigio YAMAGUCHI, 2008/01/15