Re: GNU GLOBAL skips indexing of inline functions in files having C++ support macros

[Shigio YAMAGUCHI]

On Thu, 06 Nov 2008 11:11:27 +0100
address@hidden wrote:

> This would be great. 
> 
> What would be the most-intuitive "Lost Line" message?... Perhaps plain space? 
> "func     20 file.c          "? "func     20 file.c   --- past end of file 
> ---"? ...

It's a good viewpoint.

I noticed another viewpoint by your examples.
When processed by some programs, plain space might be more suitable.
Some programs may consider "-- Lost" or "--- past end of file ---"
is part of source code.

Thus, I would like to take plain space.
As you said, this is also intuitive enough.
--
Shigio YAMAGUCHI <address@hidden>
PGP fingerprint: D1CB 0B89 B346 4AB6 5663  C4B6 3CA5 BBB3 57BE DDA3