> llvm-or1k/in1lude/llvm/CodeGen/MachineScheduler.h|335| <<releaseSucc>> void releaseSucc(SUnit *SU, SDep *SuccEdge);
> llvm-or1k/li1/CodeGen/MachineScheduler.cpp|539| <<releaseSucc>> releaseSucc(SU, &*I);
> llvm-or1k/li1/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/ScheduleDAGVLIW.cpp|86| <<releaseSucc>> void releaseSucc(SUnit *SU, const SDep &D);
> llvm-or1k/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/ScheduleDAGVLIW.cpp|146| <<releaseSucc>> releaseSucc(SU, *I);
>
> Fist and third results are incorrect. They are declarations of these functions and not the callers.
You are right. But they are right by GLOBAL's angle.
The output of ':cs f c releaseSucc' is only the result of 'global -xr releaseSucc'.
The present parser consider declarations which have no definition as references.
So, the fist and third results are not incorrect.
Gtags-cscope is a tool which just borrowed user interface of cscope; it is GLOBAL
itself for the substance.
There is a problem in the title "Find locations calling this function:" on gtags-cscope.
I would like to change it to "Find references of this function:" to reduce misunderstanding.
What do you think?
Regards,
Shigio