Re: [patch 4.1.3] Correctly handle zero operands with gcc on PA

[Torbjorn Granlund]

  > --- longlong.h.orig Fri May 21 15:15:07 2004
  > +++ longlong.h      Fri May 21 15:16:05 2004
  > @@ -206,11 +206,11 @@ long __MPN(count_leading_zeros) _PROTO (
  >     is just a case of no direct support for 2.0n but treating it like 1.0. 
*/
  >  #if defined (__GNUC__) && ! defined (_LONG_LONG_LIMB)
  >  #define add_ssaaaa(sh, sl, ah, al, bh, bl) \
  > -  __asm__ ("add %4,%5,%1\n\tadd,dc %2,%3,%0"                               
\
  > +  __asm__ ("add %r4,%r5,%1\n\tadd,dc %r2,%r3,%0"                   \
  >        : "=r" (sh), "=&r" (sl)                                      \
  >        : "rM" (ah), "rM" (bh), "%rM" (al), "rM" (bl))
  >  #define sub_ddmmss(sh, sl, ah, al, bh, bl) \
  > -  __asm__ ("sub %4,%5,%1\n\tsub,db %2,%3,%0"                               
\
  > +  __asm__ ("sub %r4,%r5,%1\n\tsub,db %r2,%r3,%0"                   \
  >        : "=r" (sh), "=&r" (sl)                                      \
  >        : "rM" (ah), "rM" (bh), "rM" (al), "rM" (bl))
  
  Looks likely, but I don't speak enough hppa to evaluate this, Cc'ed to
  someone who does.  (This is the 2.0w macros.)

These changes look right (and are in fact in the mainline cvs).

--
Torbjörn