[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnupedia] RE: Bug-gnupedia digest, Vol 1 #9 - 12 msgs
From: |
Seth Nickell |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnupedia] RE: Bug-gnupedia digest, Vol 1 #9 - 12 msgs |
Date: |
Wed, 17 Jan 2001 17:37:49 -0800 |
You could probably take a system like advogato (http://www.advogato.org)
and adapt it slightly for this purpose.
Mike Warren wrote:
>
> "Paul Jones" <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > possibly a rating system that allows for self/local censorship?
>
> Perhaps each user could say to the system, ``I trust these reviewers:
> x, y, and z''. Then, if those reviewers also trust other reviewers,
> the user could ask to see only ``trusted'' entries if she wishes.
>
> The system could build up an aggregate rating of each article based on
> a number of criteria (including the above ``trust''), and the user
> could select a cut-off rating which would eliminate articles below
> that level.
>
> This could be further complicated in a number of ways: by degrading
> the trust ratings such that reviewers 1 or 2 degrees away from the
> user count more towards the article's final rating than reviewers 5 or
> 6 degrees away; or by having reviewers or authors with more total
> ``trust'' grant articles they rate more weighting in the final
> aggregate rating of the article.
>
> I'm sure I can come up with more complications given time ;)
>
> --
> address@hidden
> <URL:http://www.mike-warren.com>
> GPG: 0x579911BD :: 87F2 4D98 BDB0 0E90 EE2A 0CF9 1087 0884 5799 11BD
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bug-gnupedia mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnupedia