RE: [Bug-gnupedia] XML Article format (update)

[Duncan Lock]

        Having read even more of the posts and done some reading I belive
that we absolutly must consider using the Dublin Code Metadata 'tags'
recomendations, http://purl.oclc.org/dc/, which seem to be the de facto
standard in the digital library world (see '[Bug-gnupedia] Software for
managing textual collections - by <address@hidden>
address@hidden' on this list.) As this is apparently
supported by greenstone, this should be no problem...

Dunc.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: address@hidden [mailto:address@hidden
> Behalf Of Duncan Lock
> Sent: 18 January 2001 12:32
> To: Bug-Gnupedia (E-mail)
> Subject: [Bug-gnupedia] XML Article format (update)
> 
> 
> Hi,
>       Following up from my previous post and having read some 
> more of the
> posts concerning classification here is a slightly modified 
> version of the
> XML example layout:
> 
> <?xml version="1.0"?>
> <?xml:stylesheet rel="stylesheet" type="text/xsl" href="gnupedia
> article.xsl" ?>
> 
> <article>
>       <authors>
>               <author>
>                       <name></name>
>                       <email></email>
>                       <wwwurl></wwwurl>
>                       <digital-signature></digital-signature>
>               </author>
>               ...
>       </authors>
>       <version>
>               <number></number>
>               <created-on></created-on>
>               <last-updated></last-updated>
>       </version>
>       <reviews>
>               <reviewer>
>                       <name></name>
>                       <email></email>
>                       <wwwurl></wwwurl>
>                       <digital-signature></digital-signature>
>                       <date-of-review></date-of-review>
>                       <review>
>                       </review>
>               </reviewer>
>               ...
>       </reviews>
>       <copyleft></copyleft>
>       
>       <classification>
>               <subject
>                       name=""
>                       dewey=""
>                       loc=""
>               </subject>
>               ...
>       </classification>
>       
>       <content
>               title="" />
>               
>               <!-- 
>                       Article body goes here, using, possibly,
>                       pretty standard HTML tags: <h1>, <h2> etc, 
>                       <p>, <em>, <strong> and so on.
>               -->
>       </content>      
> </article>
> 
>       Note the new <classification> section containing any number of
> subjects allowing an article to be classified under an 
> arbitrarily number of
> subjects/categories
> 
> Dunc.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Bug-gnupedia mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnupedia
>