[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Summary
From: |
Bob Dodd |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Summary |
Date: |
Fri, 19 Jan 2001 08:28:46 -0800 (PST) |
--- address@hidden wrote:
> Okay, I figured I would summarize the rough consensus that seems to
> be
> forming:
>
> 1. Both Nupedia and GNUpedia want to be able to share articles.
> Nupedia has
> the lead here. This would imply that both share the same
> representational
> system (XML, etc.).
>
> 2. Nupedia is a heavily peer-reviewed and editted collection designed
> to
> produce something similar in style (though not necessarily in scope)
> to a
> standard encyclopedia. One generally-accepted perspective that tries
> to be as
> neutral as possible. GNUpedia would be complete uncensored and would
> turn
> into something along the lines of Everything2, though with more
> structure and
> depth.
>
> Is this an accurate summary of where people are going?
I think people are still thinking "encyclopedia". It's just the way
material arrives, and how it is reviewed/rated for presentation that
differs. And I guess, even some of the review process may be the same?
(double-blind reviewing etc.)
/Bob Dodd
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/