[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Architecture Questions
From: |
Hook |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Architecture Questions |
Date: |
Sun, 21 Jan 2001 17:07:06 +0800 |
> Tom Chance <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > We just know its advantages and general workings, not its minutae
> > setup and code, as yet lol. So if anyone here knows sufficient
> > Perl, DBI and CGI stuff...
>
> What exactly are the advantages of using a MySQL database? I'm not
> extremely familiar with it, but I don't see why human readable files
> (in XML or SGML or whatever) aren't a Good Thing.
For anything other than small collections of files, it's almost always
faster to find information using a properly constructed database. Human
readable files holding the content are indeed A Good Thing (tm), however,
the meta information (author, title, subject etc) are probably better stored
in a database for ease of access, ease of updating, simple multi-user
access, searching etc.
MySQL is (1) free, (2) a reasonably good database, (3) damned fast and (4)
limited in some important ways. As a start, it's got a lot going for it.
Paul
- Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Architecture Questions, (continued)
Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Architecture Questions, Tom Chance, 2001/01/20
Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Architecture Questions, Imran Ghory, 2001/01/21
Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Architecture Questions, Mike Warren, 2001/01/22
Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Architecture Questions, Tom Chance, 2001/01/21
Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Architecture Questions, Bob Dodd, 2001/01/21
Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Architecture Questions, Rob Scott, 2001/01/21