[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnupedia] just HTML??
From: |
Mike Warren |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnupedia] just HTML?? |
Date: |
23 Jan 2001 16:43:20 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) XEmacs/21.1 (20 Minutes to Nikko) |
Tom Chance <address@hidden> writes:
> Easily! I'm not sure, but I have a feeling you can do this in a
> mySQL database anyway. I'll look into it. And even if you couldn't,
> as the database will have to be parsed by a perl script, [..]
Here is precisely why I think a database for the article repository is
a Bad Thing. At some point, this repository will contain hundreds of
thousands of articles, with dozens of different classifier schemes
accessing it. Since the back-end shouldn't be doing any classification
of its own, there is no need to ``search'' or ``index'' the content of
the repository, eliminating the advantages of a database. However, you
*would* need to re-constitute the XML from the database for every
request by a classifier, significantly increasing the load on the
repository servers for no good reason at all.
--
address@hidden
<URL:http://www.mike-warren.com>
GPG: 0x579911BD :: 87F2 4D98 BDB0 0E90 EE2A 0CF9 1087 0884 5799 11BD
- Re: [Bug-gnupedia] just HTML??, (continued)
Re: [Bug-gnupedia] just HTML??, Christopher Mahan, 2001/01/23
Re: [Bug-gnupedia] just HTML??, Tom Chance, 2001/01/23
- Re: [Bug-gnupedia] just HTML??,
Mike Warren <=
Re: [Bug-gnupedia] just HTML??, Christopher Mahan, 2001/01/23
Re: [Bug-gnupedia] just HTML??, Christopher Mahan, 2001/01/23