[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnupedia] A system of moderation
From: |
Mike Warren |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnupedia] A system of moderation |
Date: |
24 Jan 2001 20:17:14 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) XEmacs/21.1 (20 Minutes to Nikko) |
"Imran Ghory" <address@hidden> writes:
> On 23 Jan 2001, at 15:36, Mike Warren wrote:
> > My point is that the actual article repository shouldn't have any
> > classification information whatever; as is clear from these
> > discussions, there are many different opinions on how to classify
> > things and this suggests that there will be continual arguments if
> > one classification is imposed on the content. No, the XML should
> > not have a classification in it at all.
> Even if the author wished to add classification data ? (i.e the
> ability to say "this article may be biased by my personal beliefs")
If an author wants to write something, then he should. I'm saying that
classification meta-data shouldn't be put into the back-end database.
--
address@hidden
<URL:http://www.mike-warren.com>
GPG: 0x579911BD :: 87F2 4D98 BDB0 0E90 EE2A 0CF9 1087 0884 5799 11BD
- Re: [Bug-gnupedia] A system of moderation, (continued)
- Re: [Bug-gnupedia] A system of moderation, Bryce Harrington, 2001/01/23
- Re: [Bug-gnupedia] A system of moderation, Mike Warren, 2001/01/23
- Re: [Bug-gnupedia] A system of moderation, Imran Ghory, 2001/01/23
- Re: [Bug-gnupedia] A system of moderation, Mike Warren, 2001/01/23
- Re: [Bug-gnupedia] A system of moderation, Imran Ghory, 2001/01/24
- Re: [Bug-gnupedia] A system of moderation, Mike Warren, 2001/01/24
Re: [Bug-gnupedia] A system of moderation, Rob Scott, 2001/01/21
Re: [Bug-gnupedia] A system of moderation, Tom Chance, 2001/01/23
Re: [Bug-gnupedia] A system of moderation, Tom Chance, 2001/01/23
Re: [Bug-gnupedia] A system of moderation, Tom Chance, 2001/01/24