[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Content Format
From: |
Bob Dodd |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Content Format |
Date: |
Fri, 26 Jan 2001 01:21:31 -0800 (PST) |
Yes, Word can export in Ascii (though you do have to choose your line
terminations carefully :-)) but that's missing the point:
You lose the ability to embed pictures, add emphasis, define headings,
attach meta-data... Even of you're happint with the look of the
material after converting to Ascii, a longish article becomes a
nightmare to maintain (footnotes etc. fall apart) once you've lost the
formatting info. You're not much better off than if you submitted
postscript...
Btw. Jimbo, I would consider all informative material to have the same
weight. No way would I give special privileges to certain individuals
because of some perceived social standing. It's the material what
counts, now who wrote it. I guess it's the difference beween an open
encyclopedia like GNE and a closed one like Nupedia.
/Bob Dodd
--- Mike Warren <address@hidden> wrote:
> Jimmy Wales <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > But imagine a really great author, a Professor Emeritus in British
> > History from Yale. (I just made this person up.) He's been
> writing
> > in Microsoft Word for 10 years, and he isn't about to learn
> anything
> > else for our sake. I think we probably can accomodate him by
> > accepting his submission and (by hand, I imagine) converting it for
> > him.
>
> Word can export in ASCII.
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - Buy the things you want at great prices.
http://auctions.yahoo.com/
Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Content Format, Bob Dodd, 2001/01/26