[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Content Format
From: |
Imran Ghory |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Content Format |
Date: |
Mon, 29 Jan 2001 21:21:02 -0000 |
On 29 Jan 2001, at 12:52, Mike Warren wrote:
> > Currently I've not heard of Microsoft claiming *any* rights over
> > content produced using their software, and I'd appreciate someone
> > quoting chapter and verse if I'm wrong.
>
> This isn't the issue. Word is not a free format, and Microsoft has
> pursued authors of programs which include support for some of their
> formats (I posted an article here earlier).
Simple way to solve that problem, ask Microsoft for permission.
If Microsoft don't give us permission to convert from their format
then we drop the issue of Word support.
However if Microsoft do give permission that arguement becomes
annuled.
How about it Hector ?
Imran
- Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Content Format, (continued)
- Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Content Format, Rajarshi Guha, 2001/01/26
- Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Content Format, Mike Warren, 2001/01/27
- Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Content Format, Hook, 2001/01/27
- Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Content Format, Alexander Braun, 2001/01/27
- Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Content Format, Mike Warren, 2001/01/27
- Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Content Format, Imran Ghory, 2001/01/28
- Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Content Format, Hook, 2001/01/29
- Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Content Format, Mike Warren, 2001/01/29
- Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Content Format,
Imran Ghory <=
- Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Content Format, Alexander Braun, 2001/01/30
- Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Content Format, Mike Warren, 2001/01/27
Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Content Format, Tom Chance, 2001/01/27
Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Content Format, Tom Chance, 2001/01/27
Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Content Format, Soam Vasani, 2001/01/28