[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Content Format
From: |
hooker |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Content Format |
Date: |
Tue, 30 Jan 2001 10:01:30 +0800 |
> Hi, Paul,
> Thanks for participating in the conversation...
You're welcome Dan, I'm thoroughly enjoying it !
Dan wrote:
> I think GNE is about having a free alternative to the content that many
> companies will want to make you pay for in the future. Of course, the
> community of authors is very important.
>
> RMS says in the Project Announcement: "The last and most important rule
for
> pages in the encyclopedia is the exclusionary rule: If a page on the web
> covers subject matter that ought to be in the encyclopedia or the course
> library, but its license is too restricted to qualify, we must not make
> links to it from encyclopedia articles or from courses."
>
> Now if we're going to forgo information of this nature, it's a safe bet
that
> we're willing to forgo the contributions of authors who refuse to
contribute
> their material in a free format.
I guess that's my personal stumbling block. I don't see the validity of
that argument, and perhaps I need to think about it more.
Hmmm .....
Paul
Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Content Format, hooker, 2001/01/29
Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Content Format, Dan Geiser, 2001/01/29
Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Content Format,
hooker <=
Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Content Format, hooker, 2001/01/29
Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Content Format, Bob Dodd, 2001/01/30
Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Content Format, Dan Geiser, 2001/01/30