This is an automatic notification regarding your bug report
which was filed against the emacs package:
#4259: Cannot indent fortran continue statement in emacs 23
It has been closed by Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org>.
Their explanation is attached below along with your original report.
If this explanation is unsatisfactory and you have not received a
better one in a separate message then please contact Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org>
by
replying to this email.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject:
Re: Cannot indent fortran continue statement in emacs 23
From:
Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org>
Date:
Sat, 29 Aug 2009 21:40:33 -0400
To:
4259-done@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com
To:
4259-done@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com
I believe this is fixed in the current CVS trunk. It would be great if
you are able to test it out.
2009-08-30 Glenn Morris <rgm at gnu.org>
* progmodes/fortran.el (fortran-start-prog-re): New constant, extracted
from fortran-current-defun.
(fortran-beginning-of-subprogram): Be more precise about finding the
start, to avoid an infinite loop in end-of-defun. (Bug#4259)
(fortran-end-of-subprogram): Simplify.
(fortran-current-defun): Use fortran-start-prog-re.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject:
Cannot indent fortran continue statement in emacs 23
From:
Ushnish Basu <ubasu@cal.berkeley.edu>
Date:
Tue, 25 Aug 2009 12:09:30 -0700
To:
"Michael D. Prange" <prange@erl.mit.edu>, Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org>
To:
"Michael D. Prange" <prange@erl.mit.edu>, Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org>
Hello,
I believe I came across a bug in the latest version of the fortran mode
in emacs 23. Currently I am using version 23.1.1, but I did not have
this problem with 23.0.60 from CVS.
Please see the following sample code - I have arranged it as such only
to illustrate the problem:
subroutine first
do 10 i=1,10
10 continue
end
do 20 i=1,100
20 continue
If I run fortran-indent-line on the first continue (label 10) it works
fine. However, if I run it on the second one (label 20), I get the error:
fortran-check-end-prog-re: Lisp nesting exceeds 'max-lisp-eval-depth'
presumably because it is after the 'end'
If I increase max-lisp-eval-depth (and max-specpdl-size) to 10000, then
I get the error
fortran-check-end-prog-re: Variable binding depth exceeds max-specpdl-size
Is this something that has been fixed in CVS?
I look forward to hearing back from you.
Thanks,
Ushnish