[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#21145: 24.4; package update gives tls errors
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#21145: 24.4; package update gives tls errors |
Date: |
Tue, 28 Jul 2015 14:38:42 +0300 |
> From: Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 16:51:16 +0530
> Cc: 21145@debbugs.gnu.org
>
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
> >> From: Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com>
> >> Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 08:29:56 +0530
> >>
> >> Start emacs with -Q
> >> Run (package-initialize)
> >> Run (add-to-list 'package-archives
> >> '("marmalade" . "https://marmalade-repo.org/packages/") t)
> >> Run M-x package-list-packages
> >>
> >> Get error
> >> gnutls.c: [0] (Emacs) fatal error: The TLS connection was non-properly
> >> terminated.
> >>
> >> Some info from ldconfig -v|grep libgnutls
> >>
> >> libgnutls-deb0.so.28 -> libgnutls-deb0.so.28.41.0
> >> /sbin/ldconfig.real: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-2.21.so is the dynamic
> >> linker, ignoring
> >>
> >> libgnutls-openssl.so.27 -> libgnutls-openssl.so.27.0.2
> >> libgnutls-deb0.so.28 -> libgnutls-deb0.so.28.41.0
> >
> > I cannot reproduce this on my system (not on Ubuntu) with the same
> > version of GnuTLS. I get a listing of packages, including those from
> > marmalade, as expected.
>
> I also get the listing (from marmalade)
But I see no error message in *Messages*, so what you report is not
reproducible here. This is GnuTLS 3.3.11, btw.
> > I suspect some problem specific to your site or Internet connection,
> > or perhaps some Ubuntu-specific issue.
>
> Well its a well-known problem
> see https://github.com/nicferrier/elmarmalade/issues/55
> Also bug 16253
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnu-emacs/2014-01/msg00358.html
>
> Was just informing that it continues to exist
I don't see what we can do with this, and at least some of the
messages above say we should leave this alone, as it's not a bug in
Emacs.
Perhaps you should send this report to the GnuTLS list, and ask the
developers why GnuTLS considers this such a high priority message.