[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#23640: 25.1.50; Getting rid of compiler warnings
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
bug#23640: 25.1.50; Getting rid of compiler warnings |
Date: |
Wed, 01 Jun 2016 16:37:52 -0400 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> This wouldn't be enough to handle other cases, e.g., 'IF_LINT (= Qnil)' and
> 'IF_LINT (volatile)'.
A macro UNUSED_LISP could handle the first.
What is the reason for writing IF_LINT (volatile)
instead of just volatile?
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (internethalloffame.org)
Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html.
- bug#23640: 25.1.50; Getting rid of compiler warnings, Paul Eggert, 2016/06/01
- bug#23640: 25.1.50; Getting rid of compiler warnings,
Richard Stallman <=
- bug#23640: 25.1.50; Getting rid of compiler warnings, Paul Eggert, 2016/06/01
- bug#23640: 25.1.50; Getting rid of compiler warnings, Andy Moreton, 2016/06/02
- bug#23640: 25.1.50; Getting rid of compiler warnings, Richard Stallman, 2016/06/02
- bug#23640: 25.1.50; Getting rid of compiler warnings, Paul Eggert, 2016/06/06
- bug#23640: 25.1.50; Getting rid of compiler warnings, Richard Stallman, 2016/06/07
- bug#23640: 25.1.50; Getting rid of compiler warnings, Paul Eggert, 2016/06/07
- bug#23640: 25.1.50; Getting rid of compiler warnings, Richard Stallman, 2016/06/08
- bug#23640: 25.1.50; Getting rid of compiler warnings, Paul Eggert, 2016/06/08
- bug#23640: 25.1.50; Getting rid of compiler warnings, Richard Stallman, 2016/06/08