[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#36392: (info "(elisp)Writing Emacs Primitives") might need some clar
|
From: |
Basil L. Contovounesios |
|
Subject: |
bug#36392: (info "(elisp)Writing Emacs Primitives") might need some clarifications |
|
Date: |
Wed, 26 Jun 2019 22:29:13 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
tags 36392 fixed
close 36392 26.3
quit
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>> From: "Basil L. Contovounesios" <contovob@tcd.ie>
>> Cc: stefan@marxist.se, 36392@debbugs.gnu.org
>> Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 19:20:25 +0100
>>
>> Do you prefer not to switch the example to Fwhile?
>
> Yes, I think we should just describe UNEVAL, so that the example
> doesn't confuse.
Okay, I pushed a more measured patch to emacs-26[1]. Stefan, do these
patches address your concerns, or do you think further clarification is
required?
[1: 8b775c30ad]: Clarify & update (elisp) Writing Emacs Primitives
2019-06-26 22:16:52 +0100
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git/commit/?id=8b775c30adaad63a4838e911d6c02e55a4269c4e
Thanks,
--
Basil