|
From: | Gregory Heytings |
Subject: | bug#56682: locked narrowing |
Date: | Thu, 01 Dec 2022 23:11:09 +0000 |
I give up. I will probably try to find time to code this myself, since you don't even want to try.Of course I'm willing to try. But I already tried, I already explored the possibility you now consider, and concluded that it was not possible to do that. I'm just trying to explain why and how I reached that conclusion. If you have other ideas, I'm all ears.
What we could perhaps do is to use something like CHARS_MODIFF - UNCHANGED_MODIFIED > 8 + log10 (buffer-size) / 2That would mean that the detection loop is triggered less for larger buffers than for smaller ones, or IOW that bigger changes are needed to trigger the loop in larger buffers. It's a bit unsafe, but probably safe enough in practice.
Would that fit the bill?
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |