[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#74606: 31.0.50; Another rsvg API change
From: |
Manuel Giraud |
Subject: |
bug#74606: 31.0.50; Another rsvg API change |
Date: |
Mon, 02 Dec 2024 15:06:28 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Manuel Giraud <manuel@ledu-giraud.fr> writes:
> Osama Rebach <osamarebach@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> rsvg_handle_get_pixbuf_and_error is defined in librsvg 2.59, so the patch
>> should guard against 2.59 instead of 2.58
>
> Thanks. I have based my patch on this comment:
> https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/librsvg/-/blob/main/include/librsvg/rsvg-pixbuf.h?ref_type=heads#L52
>
> Now, I'm looking on the librsvg repo for a more valid source of
> information.
Ok, so if I'm not mistaken the patch that introduces the
rsvg_handle_get_pixbuf_and_error API (and deprecated the other) is this
one:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/librsvg/-/commit/85cdba02a3e126c1099a62b3d6421ac0cb2d790b
On this page, when you unfold the link "Tags containing commit", you can
see that 2.58.90 is the first one. So maybe, I should use this version
instead. WDYT?
The "Deprecated: 2.58" from the header looks like a copy/paste mistake.
--
Manuel Giraud
- bug#74606: 31.0.50; Another rsvg API change, Manuel Giraud, 2024/12/01
- bug#74606: 31.0.50; Another rsvg API change, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/12/01
- bug#74606: 31.0.50; Another rsvg API change, Osama Rebach, 2024/12/02
- bug#74606: 31.0.50; Another rsvg API change, Manuel Giraud, 2024/12/02
- bug#74606: 31.0.50; Another rsvg API change,
Manuel Giraud <=
- bug#74606: 31.0.50; Another rsvg API change, Manuel Giraud, 2024/12/02
- bug#74606: 31.0.50; Another rsvg API change, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/12/02
- bug#74606: 31.0.50; Another rsvg API change, Manuel Giraud, 2024/12/02
- bug#74606: 31.0.50; Another rsvg API change, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/12/02
- bug#74606: 31.0.50; Another rsvg API change, Manuel Giraud, 2024/12/02
- bug#74606: 31.0.50; Another rsvg API change, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/12/02