[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#74630: 31.0.50; emacs-mail-verify
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#74630: 31.0.50; emacs-mail-verify |
Date: |
Wed, 04 Dec 2024 15:26:15 +0200 |
> From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
> Cc: 74630@debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2024 01:09:05 -0500
>
> > Not sure what you expected the doc string to say. Would the below be
> > enough?
>
> > Verify OpenPGP cleartext signed messages in the current buffer.
> > The buffer is expected to contain a mail message.
>
> > If the verification fails, the command signals an error.
>
> That is better, becauee it gives enough information to deduce what
> indicates success. But the user should need to do any deduction about
> that, let alone read code and guess what some other functions do.
Thanks, I installed a change along those lines.
> To make the doc string truly clear, it should say explicitly what
> indicates success. That way the user can know, rather than just
> supposing.
I don't know how to describe success in this case, except as the lack
of an error.
> Should the function be changed to display a message, "Signature verified",
> on success?
It says "Verifying...done", which I think is enough (and quite
standard in Emacs).
> Do some people run this function from a hook for every message and
> want to see output only in case of failure?
See above: it displays a message in case of success as well.
> Should it a value indicating success or failure?
I don't know. The values of the relevant functions don't seem to be
documented.