[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#73404: 30.0.50; [forward/kill/etc]-sexp commands do not behave as ex
From: |
Juri Linkov |
Subject: |
bug#73404: 30.0.50; [forward/kill/etc]-sexp commands do not behave as expected in tree-sitter modes |
Date: |
Thu, 05 Dec 2024 21:53:38 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/31.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) |
>> The new logic is the following: if there is no sexp thing defined at point,
>> then fall back to 'forward-sexp-default-function'.
>>
>> Then after (setq js--treesit-sexp-nodes '("binary_expression"))
>> 'C-M-f' in e.g.
>>
>> export const add = (a, b) => -!-a + b;
>>
>> moves point to
>>
>> export const add = (a, b) => a + b-!-;
>
> Unfortunately, I still can't find a way to handle such case
> that from
>
> export const add = (a, b) -!- => a + b;
>
> typing 'C-M-f' should jump to the end of the next sexp
> (to the end of whole "binary_expression"):
>
> export const add = (a, b) => a + b-!-;
>
> since only tree-sitter knows about "binary_expression",
> so 'forward-sexp-default-function' can't be used here.
Actually, I have one idea of possible heuristics:
1. first try 'forward-sexp-default-function'
2. if it crosses the boundary of sexp defined by 'treesit-thing-settings'
then use 'treesit-end-of-thing' instead
This should work. Ok, will try.
- bug#73404: 30.0.50; [forward/kill/etc]-sexp commands do not behave as expected in tree-sitter modes, Juri Linkov, 2024/12/05
- bug#73404: 30.0.50; [forward/kill/etc]-sexp commands do not behave as expected in tree-sitter modes,
Juri Linkov <=
- bug#73404: 30.0.50; [forward/kill/etc]-sexp commands do not behave as expected in tree-sitter modes, Juri Linkov, 2024/12/10
- bug#73404: 30.0.50; [forward/kill/etc]-sexp commands do not behave as expected in tree-sitter modes, Yuan Fu, 2024/12/11
- bug#73404: 30.0.50; [forward/kill/etc]-sexp commands do not behave as expected in tree-sitter modes, Stefan Monnier, 2024/12/11
- bug#73404: 30.0.50; [forward/kill/etc]-sexp commands do not behave as expected in tree-sitter modes, Stefan Monnier, 2024/12/11
- bug#73404: 30.0.50; [forward/kill/etc]-sexp commands do not behave as expected in tree-sitter modes, Mickey Petersen, 2024/12/11
- bug#73404: 30.0.50; [forward/kill/etc]-sexp commands do not behave as expected in tree-sitter modes, Yuan Fu, 2024/12/11
- bug#73404: 30.0.50; [forward/kill/etc]-sexp commands do not behave as expected in tree-sitter modes, Juri Linkov, 2024/12/12
- bug#73404: 30.0.50; [forward/kill/etc]-sexp commands do not behave as expected in tree-sitter modes, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/12/12
- bug#73404: 30.0.50; [forward/kill/etc]-sexp commands do not behave as expected in tree-sitter modes, Juri Linkov, 2024/12/12
- bug#73404: 30.0.50; [forward/kill/etc]-sexp commands do not behave as expected in tree-sitter modes, Juri Linkov, 2024/12/12