bug#74709: [PATCH] Avoid empty unique qualifier in buffer name

[Manuel Giraud]

Visuwesh <visuweshm@gmail.com> writes:

> [வெள்ளி டிசம்பர் 06, 2024] Manuel Giraud wrote:
>
>> Visuwesh <visuweshm@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> [வெள்ளி டிசம்பர் 06, 2024] Manuel Giraud via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs,
>>> the Swiss army knife of text editors" wrote:
>>>
>>>> Tags: patch
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> This patch prevents from having an empty unique qualifier in the buffer
>>>> name.  Maybe this could happen with others file buffer as well but, most
>>>> of the time, you could witness it with Dired buffer in homedir.  Here is
>>>> a recipe:
>>>>
>>>>   - emacs -Q
>>>>   - C-x d /ssh:somewhere: ;; This buffer is named "~</ssh:somewhere:>"
>>>>   - C-x d /~/             ;; This buffer is named "~<>"
>>>>
>>>> With this patch, the last buffer will simply be named "~" instead.
>>>
>>> I usually have ~/tmp visited in a Dired buffer.  Sometimes I also visit
>>> /tmp which gets named as "tmp<>".  With this patch, /tmp's buffer is
>>> named "tmp" instead.  This confuses me as I am used to seeing "tmp" for
>>> ~/tmp's Dired buffer more often than not.  Can we gate this new
>>> behaviour behind a user option please?
>>
>> I don't think that there is more confusion then if you only have /tmp
>> opened which will have its buffer named "tmp", no?
>
> Sorry, I meant having /tmp being "tmp" when both ~/tmp and /tmp are open
> is confusing for the aforementioned reason.

Yes, you're right.  Thinking a bit more about it, I don't think this
patch was a good idea anymore.  When a buffer is named "tmp<>" it
conveys the information that there is another buffer with the same base
name.  If it is just named "tmp", we have lost this bit of information.
-- 
Manuel Giraud