[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#74287: [PATCH] Rework history Isearch for Eshell
From: |
Pengji Zhang |
Subject: |
bug#74287: [PATCH] Rework history Isearch for Eshell |
Date: |
Wed, 11 Dec 2024 08:45:01 +0800 |
Juri Linkov <juri@linkov.net> writes:
>>> I agree this would be the right thing, because even in Isearch we
>>> have variables that duplicate the user options such as e.g. the
>>> option 'search-invisible' and the internal variable
>>> 'isearch-invisible'.
>>
>> Thanks!
>
> Please also see the commit 98f8c5fb07dcb4e20b8ba6648bdabf5c0d3b5145
> that fixed this in dired by using a buffer-local variable. Do you
> agree it's a good fix? Otherwise using a separate variable is also
> fine.
My concern with using a local variable is that users may also set the
user option locally. That is perhaps not a problem for eshell or dired,
but for comint, e.g., I may set 'comint-history-isearch' to 'dwim' only
in 'M-x shell' via the mode hook.
IMO, changing an internal variable feels a bit cleaner and safer than
manipulating a user option. So I would prefer using a separate variable.
- bug#74287: [PATCH] Rework history Isearch for Eshell, (continued)
- bug#74287: [PATCH] Rework history Isearch for Eshell, Pengji Zhang, 2024/12/05
- bug#74287: [PATCH] Rework history Isearch for Eshell, Juri Linkov, 2024/12/09
- bug#74287: [PATCH] Rework history Isearch for Eshell, Pengji Zhang, 2024/12/09
- bug#74287: [PATCH] Rework history Isearch for Eshell, Juri Linkov, 2024/12/10
- bug#74287: [PATCH] Rework history Isearch for Eshell, Pengji Zhang, 2024/12/10
- bug#74287: [PATCH] Rework history Isearch for Eshell, Juri Linkov, 2024/12/10
- bug#74287: [PATCH] Rework history Isearch for Eshell,
Pengji Zhang <=
- bug#74287: [PATCH] Rework history Isearch for Eshell, Juri Linkov, 2024/12/11
- bug#74287: [PATCH] Rework history Isearch for Eshell, Jim Porter, 2024/12/11