[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#74773: [PATCH] Elaborate doc string for rcirc-next-active-buffer
From: |
Philip Kaludercic |
Subject: |
bug#74773: [PATCH] Elaborate doc string for rcirc-next-active-buffer |
Date: |
Wed, 11 Dec 2024 16:31:56 +0000 |
Leo Liu <sdl.web@gmail.com> writes:
>> On 11 Dec 2024, at 20:21, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2024 12:20:04 -0700
>>> From: Scott Bell via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs,
>>> the Swiss army knife of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
>>>
>>> I found the current behavior of rcirc-next-active-buffer surprising in
>>> the case where there is no activity, so I thought it could be described
>>> in the doc string.
>>
>> Leo and Philip, is this okay to install?
>
> After checking all irc buffers with activity, the next
> rcirc-next-active-buffer returns you back to the buffer where your work is ie
> non irc buffers.
>
> So the patch doesn’t add much though harmless.
1+
> — Leo
>
>>
>>>> From b5a3f93c006316d53139bbd308afbf4c70c89289 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>> From: Scott Bell <sctb@me.com>
>>> Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2024 12:02:54 -0700
>>> Subject: [PATCH] ; * lisp/net/rcirc.el (rcirc-next-active-buffer): Doc
>>> string
>>>
>>> ---
>>> lisp/net/rcirc.el | 3 ++-
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/lisp/net/rcirc.el b/lisp/net/rcirc.el
>>> index c41e2ec153f..33e4008fc0b 100644
>>> --- a/lisp/net/rcirc.el
>>> +++ b/lisp/net/rcirc.el
>>> @@ -2448,7 +2448,8 @@ rcirc-bury-buffers
>>>
>>> (defun rcirc-next-active-buffer (arg)
>>> "Switch to the next rcirc buffer with activity.
>>> -With prefix ARG, go to the next low priority buffer with activity."
>>> +With prefix ARG, go to the next low priority buffer with activity.
>>> +When there are no buffers with activity, bury all rcirc buffers."
>>> (interactive "P")
>>> (let* ((pair (rcirc-split-activity rcirc-activity))
>>> (lopri (car pair))
>>> --
>>> 2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)
>>>