[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#74792: 29.2.50; goto-address-mode should support RET in special-mode
From: |
Spencer Baugh |
Subject: |
bug#74792: 29.2.50; goto-address-mode should support RET in special-mode buffers |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Dec 2024 15:47:12 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Juri Linkov <juri@linkov.net> writes:
>>> > goto-address-mode binds C-c RET to goto-address-at-point when point is
>>> > on a URL or email address. In special-mode buffers (or maybe any
>>> > read-only buffer?) it should also bind RET while point is on the URL or
>>> > email address.
>>>
>>> I don't think it's a good idea, since many special-mode descendants
>>> bind RET to useful commands. For goto-address-at-point to override
>>> that would be a nuisance, I think.
>>>
>>> True, but when I've specifically moved point to a URL it is usually because
>>> I want to follow the URL, not do
>>> whatever is bound to RET in the mode.
>>
>> You cannot know that. E.g., point could be on a URL by chance, for
>> example, if a buffer starts with a URL.
>>
>>> But this sounds like something that may differ between users, so perhaps we
>>> could add this controlled by a
>>> defcustom?
>>
>> Let's first hear that enough people here think that it might sometimes
>> be a good thing. If so, then yes, a user option, by default off,
>> could be a way to introduce such behavior.
>
> Typing just RET would be more intuitive, but indeed there is a problem
> that e.g. 'C-h C-t RET RET RET ...' will scroll lines one by one
> until this line becomes current:
>
> https://www.gnu.org/licenses/why-assign.html
>
> Then RET will surprisingly visit that URL.
>
> Unfortunately, an option can't help because most users might want to
> enable it, but only if it doesn't misfire in unexpected situations.
True. Perhaps it should be enabled buffer-locally, then. Then a user
can set it in a major-mode hook - and if a major-mode does not bind RET
to something else, the major-mode can just enable it.