[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#74295: Update TODO -> NeXTstep port -> Improved xwidgets support
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#74295: Update TODO -> NeXTstep port -> Improved xwidgets support |
Date: |
Sat, 14 Dec 2024 11:32:36 +0200 |
Ping! Ping! Po Lu, can you please answer Andrew's question, if you
know the answer?
> Cc: bobodeangelis@gmail.com, 74295@debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2024 11:46:19 +0200
> From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
>
> Ping!
>
> > Cc: 74295@debbugs.gnu.org
> > Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2024 10:22:21 +0200
> > From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
> >
> > > From: Andrew De Angelis <bobodeangelis@gmail.com>
> > > Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2024 10:13:17 -0500
> > >
> > > I have a question and a possible patch to contribute.
> > > For context: the most glaring issues with xwidget support of NS have been
> > > fixed: I contributed a patch to get
> > > rid of memory leaks a while ago, under: "bug#60703 Patches to xwidget
> > > code".
> > >
> > > I've just noticed that I forgot to update the TODO file, so it still
> > > mentions crashes:
> > > > trying to display a xwidget in the "killed" state will make Emacs crash.
> > >
> > > I've used the xwidget feature extensively and in my experience, xwidgets
> > > do not crash Emacs anymore.
> > >
> > > Question:
> > > - Could someone clarify what we mean by displaying a xwidget in the
> > > "killed" state? I want to make sure I
> > > understand the problem and it's fixed
> >
> > Can someone who knows about this (Po Lu?) answer Andrew's question?
> >
> > > Possible patch (if the problem is indeed fixed):
> > > Attached. Remove the mention of crashes, and clarify which features are
> > > still missing from the NS port.
> >
> > I installed that on the emacs-30 release branch, thanks.
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
- bug#74295: Update TODO -> NeXTstep port -> Improved xwidgets support,
Eli Zaretskii <=