bug#74844: 29.4; m-buffer: Broken Top Directory node in Info manual due to malformed Texinfo direntry

[Stefan Monnier]

>> > Why do you suggest removing TEXINFO_DIR_TITLE
>> Because of this comment in ox-texinfo.el which suggests that it is
>> obsolete:
> FWIW, I disagree with that decision of Org folks.

It's obsolete because it was renamed to TEXINFO_DIR_NAME because I don't
think it's right to think of it as a "title".

> That there is a default does not mean that we need to discard the
> description when we do have it.  Discarding it loses important
> information (which programs like install-info use).

It could lose important information, in which case we wouldn't want to
discard it.  But here it just duplicates the default.

> This is a wrong interpretation.  FILENAME here is the Info file name,
> not the Texinfo file name (the latter is the file name of the Texinfo
> source).

The Info file name is derived from the Texinfo filename.


        Stefan