[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#74920: 31.0.50; 'should' defeats warning from set-advertised-calling
From: |
Stefan Kangas |
Subject: |
bug#74920: 31.0.50; 'should' defeats warning from set-advertised-calling-convention |
Date: |
Mon, 16 Dec 2024 23:47:52 +0000 |
Severity: minor
Create a file foo.el with this content:
;; -*- lexical-binding: t; -*-
(defun foo (&optional a) a)
(set-advertised-calling-convention 'foo '(a) '"31.1")
(foo)
Create a second file bar.el with this:
;; -*- lexical-binding: t; -*-
(load "foo")
(require 'ert)
(foo)
(should (foo))
Byte-compile bar.el and observe that there is only one warning:
bar.el:4:2: Warning: ‘foo’ called with 0 arguments, but requires 1
Expected is two warnings, like this:
bar.el:4:2: Warning: ‘foo’ called with 0 arguments, but requires 1
bar.el:5:2: Warning: ‘foo’ called with 0 arguments, but requires 1
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- bug#74920: 31.0.50; 'should' defeats warning from set-advertised-calling-convention,
Stefan Kangas <=