[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#60534: 28.2; Forbidden reentrant call of Tramp
From: |
James Thomas |
Subject: |
bug#60534: 28.2; Forbidden reentrant call of Tramp |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Dec 2024 18:41:53 +0530 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Michael Albinus wrote:
> Not so simple.
> ...
> And it isn't clear to me how to keep two connections in sync, if (for
> example) the environment changes in one of the connections. Be it an
> environment variable, the current directory, the availability of a
> temp file, you name it.
And here was I thinking that Tramp was mostly remote-state-less beyond
the handshake...
> There is a serious overhead when opening a new connection, due to the
> handshaking actions.
OK; I misremembered for a moment that it was beyond any ControlPersist.
> But yes, nobody has tried it yet. My preference is to use threads, so
> that one command in a process filter could wait until another command
> in the main thread has finished, as example. But the crucial point is,
> that you must activate threads in the beginning of a connection. When
> you detect, that there is a forbidded reentrant call, it is too late
> to activate threads.
Ah, crucial; but not a blocker, I suppose.
Thank you for the effort in explaining, Michael.
Regards,
James