|
From: | Drew Adams |
Subject: | bug#75017: 31.0.50; Untrusted user lisp files |
Date: | Sun, 22 Dec 2024 18:47:49 +0000 |
(Apologies for not following this thread.) If this is about Emacs claiming/suggesting that something is trusted or untrusted, I'd say we're better off saying only that Emacs CANNOT vouch for the thing to be trusted. That's better than claiming that something can't be trusted. And it's _much_ better than claiming that something _can_ be trusted.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |