bug#17219: 24.3.50; wrong alignment when a list is given to dired

[Charalampos Mitrodimas]

Hi Jakub,


On 22/12/24 11:08 PM, Jakub Ječmínek via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the 
Swiss army knife of text editors wrote:
> It seems that adding simple `dired--align-all-files' to the end of
> `dired-revert' resolves this.
>
>  From 41780fde84fe1c55a0a7417a833dc0b8303a3db8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: =?UTF-8?q?Jakub=20Je=C4=8Dm=C3=ADnek?= <kuba@kubajecminek.cz>
> Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2024 21:53:53 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] Align files after dired revert (Bug#17219)
>
> * lisp/dired.el (dired-revert): Add dired--align-all-files
> function call.
> ---
>   lisp/dired.el | 3 ++-
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/lisp/dired.el b/lisp/dired.el
> index 028b862d159..acd31fb6424 100644
> --- a/lisp/dired.el
> +++ b/lisp/dired.el
> @@ -2157,7 +2157,8 @@ dired-revert
>         (if (dired-goto-subdir dir)
>             (dired-hide-subdir 1))))
>       (unless modflag (restore-buffer-modified-p nil))
> -    (hack-dir-local-variables-non-file-buffer))
> +    (hack-dir-local-variables-non-file-buffer)
> +    (dired--align-all-files))
What about performance? Depending on the size of the directory, 
recalculating alignment could have a minor performance impact.
>     ;; outside of the let scope
>   ;;;  Might as well not override the user if the user changed this.
>   ;;;  (setq buffer-read-only t)


--
C. Mitrodimas