[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#56197: 28.1; lisp-fill-paragraph result regressed with Emacs 28
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#56197: 28.1; lisp-fill-paragraph result regressed with Emacs 28 |
Date: |
Sat, 28 Dec 2024 10:45:30 +0200 |
> From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com>
> Cc: Felix Lechner <felix.lechner@lease-up.com>, 56197@debbugs.gnu.org,
> stefankangas@gmail.com, larsi@gnus.org
> Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2024 14:26:32 +0900
>
> I can't say it feels very satisfactory; a switch like one imagined by
> Felix could be a step in the right direction; it'd be at least more
> concise in the project .dir-locals. Would a patch implementing that be
> welcome?
I don't see how a user option to control this could be useful, since
the preferred behavior is not only buffer-local, but also specific to
certain syntactic constructs. But I won't object to having such an
option.
I also don't see what's wrong with the solution of having a special
function in .dir-locals.el. We don't pretend that the default Emacs
behavior should necessarily fit all the use cases, and provide ample
opportunities for customizing Emacs behavior for that reason.
Defining a custom fill-paragraph function is a perfectly valid
solution, not very different from having a user option for the same
purpose. So I'm not sure I understand why you prefer adding an
option, when the Guix project has already solved the problem in a
perfectly legitimate and clean way.