bug-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#74881: 31.0.50; [PATCH] * lisp/vc/ediff-util.el: Remove temp files o


From: Eli Zaretskii
Subject: bug#74881: 31.0.50; [PATCH] * lisp/vc/ediff-util.el: Remove temp files on kill-emacs
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2024 15:02:31 +0200

> From: Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen@web.de>
> Cc: sunlin7@hotmail.com,  74881@debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2024 00:34:22 +0100
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> 
> > > > @@ -488,6 +496,7 @@ ediff-setup
> > > >        (if (ediff-buffer-live-p ediff-meta-buffer)
> > > >           (ediff-update-meta-buffer
> > > >            ediff-meta-buffer nil ediff-meta-session-number))
> > > > +      (add-hook 'kill-emacs-hook 
> > > > #'ediff--delete-temp-files-on-kill-emacs)
> > >
> > > Would it be ok to avoid the above loop completely by using the buffer
> > > local version of `kill-emacs-hook' instead?
> >
> > You assume that the temporary Ediff files are always visited in some
> > buffer?  Is that assumption true?
> 
> I think you misunderstood: my idea was to put `ediff-delete-temp-files'
> to the local hook binding of the ediff control buffers (which we
> currently consult anyway).  This would result in the same calls as now -
> at least when local `kill-emacs-hook' bindings worked.

I don't understand how a buffer-local kill-emacs-hook could work.
Emacs calls the value of this hook only once, when it is going to
exit.  So if the value is buffer-local, whether or not the hook is
called will depend on which buffer is the current buffer when Emacs is
killed.  Or did I miss something?





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]