[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PSPP-BUG: Bug Report for PSPP 0.7.8 on Fedora
From: |
Ben Pfaff |
Subject: |
Re: PSPP-BUG: Bug Report for PSPP 0.7.8 on Fedora |
Date: |
Wed, 07 Mar 2012 22:19:13 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) |
Eliana <address@hidden> writes:
> Sorry, I did not know you needed that, I was just following the
> instructions in the output It was so far above the instructions and
> error listing , I did not even see it, but just reran on a smaller
> sample so I can provide that to you.
Ordinarily, full output would not be necessary, but I was not
able to reproduce the problem so it seemed like a good question
to ask.
> Note that the complaints pspp made about inappropriate data were due
> to my not yet having figured out where in the first line of code to
> put /FIRSTCASE=2. I have now got that working but the program I reran
> to provide you with output, I left without the firstcase statement as
> in the original run.
That makes sense.
> Before I paste that long output here, let me mention that after
> getting John's response to a different query on pspp-help, I revised
> the program in two ways and got it to run successfully, so I think the
> issue may just be it had no error message to catch my error?
>
> I am new and believed the manual when it said blank lines could be
> used to finish a command. Once I added a period at the end of the
> last line, it ran smoothly.
Indeed, a blank line should terminate a command. If it doesn't,
then this sounds like a bug in PSPP. To check, I tried writing a
syntax file a few ways with blank lines (and no period) at the
end. The cases that I tried worked as I expected: the last
command in the file was executed. Can you pass along an example
that doesn't work? I would like to fix the problem.
> I will attach the program file I used to recreate the scenario.
Hmm. I still cannot reproduce the crash. I guess that it is
possible that the bug has already been fixed, seeing as 0.7.8 is
slightly old.
Thank you for the report and the additional information.
--
Ben Pfaff
http://benpfaff.org