[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PSPP-BUG: pspp bug
From: |
Ben Pfaff |
Subject: |
Re: PSPP-BUG: pspp bug |
Date: |
Wed, 04 Apr 2012 09:17:17 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) |
That seems bad. "1.00" and NaN are pretty different. Do you
think it's worth looking into the calculations, or should we just
ignore this difference as we have others?
John Darrington <address@hidden> writes:
> My system fails the new test:
>
> 395. factor.at:1803: testing FACTOR /ROTATION=NOROTATE ...
> ../../tests/factor.at:1821: pspp -O format=csv factor-norotate.sps
> --- - 2012-04-04 11:18:24.388115600 +0100
> +++
> /home/Darringt/.p/P/UTP_00/ClearQuest/tests/testsuite.dir/at-groups/395/stdout
> 2012-04-04 11:18:23.366814100 +0100
> @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
> TRAIT5,7.29,2.66,7
>
> Table: KMO and Bartlett's Test
> -Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy,,1.00
> +Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy,,NaN
> Bartlett's Test of Sphericity,Approx. Chi-Square,NaN
> ,df,10
> ,Sig.,NaN
> 395. factor.at:1803: FAILED (factor.at:1821)
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 10:00:28PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> Thank you very much for the bug report. I reproduced the bug and
> fixed this on the PSPP "master" branch.
> --
> Ben Pfaff
> http://benpfaff.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bug-gnu-pspp mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnu-pspp
--
Ben Pfaff
http://benpfaff.org
- PSPP-BUG: pspp bug, abderrahim arif, 2012/04/03
- Re: PSPP-BUG: pspp bug, Ben Pfaff, 2012/04/04
- Re: PSPP-BUG: pspp bug, John Darrington, 2012/04/04
- Re: PSPP-BUG: pspp bug,
Ben Pfaff <=
- Re: PSPP-BUG: pspp bug, John Darrington, 2012/04/04
- Re: PSPP-BUG: pspp bug, Ben Pfaff, 2012/04/06
- Re: PSPP-BUG: pspp bug, John Darrington, 2012/04/06
- Re: PSPP-BUG: pspp bug, John Darrington, 2012/04/08
- Re: PSPP-BUG: pspp bug, Ben Pfaff, 2012/04/08