[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PSPP-BUG: [GNU PSPP 1.0.1] testsuite: 36 failed
From: |
Ben Pfaff |
Subject: |
Re: PSPP-BUG: [GNU PSPP 1.0.1] testsuite: 36 failed |
Date: |
Mon, 18 Sep 2017 12:32:47 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) |
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 06:33:43PM +0000, Ross, Daniel B. wrote:
> I see your both not in US. I work for a university that is also a Hospital
> so everything is considered HIPAA. Its a legal, thing here in the US. sort
> of a blame everyone else kind of move. So they would completely ignore me.
> I will have to look up something ins office 365 see if there is a way of
> requesting it not do that. Windows really isnt my thing, nor is exchange.
>
>
> Thanks for the tip I switched the build to be owned by a users and compiled
> it that way. The tests did indeed complete successfully.
Thanks for the update.
> Should I have it be owned by a fake user with no login for security purposes?
I don't think that is necessary.
- Re: PSPP-BUG: [GNU PSPP 1.0.1] testsuite: 36 failed, (continued)
- Re: PSPP-BUG: [GNU PSPP 1.0.1] testsuite: 36 failed, Ross, Daniel B., 2017/09/18
- Re: PSPP-BUG: [GNU PSPP 1.0.1] testsuite: 36 failed, Ben Pfaff, 2017/09/18
- Re: PSPP-BUG: [GNU PSPP 1.0.1] testsuite: 36 failed, John Darrington, 2017/09/18
- Re: PSPP-BUG: [GNU PSPP 1.0.1] testsuite: 36 failed, Ross, Daniel B., 2017/09/18
- Re: PSPP-BUG: [GNU PSPP 1.0.1] testsuite: 36 failed, John Darrington, 2017/09/18
- Re: PSPP-BUG: [GNU PSPP 1.0.1] testsuite: 36 failed, Ross, Daniel B., 2017/09/18
- Re: PSPP-BUG: [GNU PSPP 1.0.1] testsuite: 36 failed, Friedrich Beckmann, 2017/09/18
- Re: PSPP-BUG: [GNU PSPP 1.0.1] testsuite: 36 failed, Ross, Daniel B., 2017/09/18
- Re: PSPP-BUG: [GNU PSPP 1.0.1] testsuite: 36 failed, Friedrich Beckmann, 2017/09/18
- Re: PSPP-BUG: [GNU PSPP 1.0.1] testsuite: 36 failed, Ross, Daniel B., 2017/09/18
- Re: PSPP-BUG: [GNU PSPP 1.0.1] testsuite: 36 failed,
Ben Pfaff <=