[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Improved gnubg filenaming convention - suggestion
From: |
Francesco Ariis |
Subject: |
Re: Improved gnubg filenaming convention - suggestion |
Date: |
Thu, 18 Jan 2024 13:10:55 +0100 |
Hello Joseph,
Il 18 gennaio 2024 alle 11:33 Wayne Joseph ha scritto:
> To propose a relatively 'easy' solution to this, I think it would make
> better sense to add an hour-minute timestamp to the existing file name
> convention?
>
> [snip]
>
> In addition, for a cherry on top, it would be even better if the error rate
> for each analysed match was also appended to the file name i.e. -4.3 or
> -8.5 or whatever. This could allow for even easier searching and
> filtering/foldering of match files with blunders for retrospective study on
> each user's PC
I find the suggestion to add full timestamp reasonable, error rate less
convincing (Whose error rate? Both?).
Tangent: GNUbg has some facility to store statistics in a relational
database, maybe it could help in your case.
—F