[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: GNUbg version 1.08.001 available
From: |
Ian Shaw |
Subject: |
RE: GNUbg version 1.08.001 available |
Date: |
Mon, 12 Feb 2024 12:14:47 +0000 |
I installed the latest version, and all my settings appear intact. At least,
the board colours and number of threads are as I remember them.
I've tried on 2 PCs and both are OK.
I still have the problem on my desktop where I have to move a dialog window a
few mm before I can click a second option. The laptop is OK.
The Windows build is the same, but they are different gen processors.
Desktop: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-10700 CPU @ 2.90GHz 2.90 GHz Windows
10 Pro 22H2 OS Build 19045.3930 Windows Feature Experience Pack
1000.19053.1000.0
Laptop: 12th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-1265U 1.80 GHz Windows
10 Pro 22H2 OS Build 19045.3930 Windows Feature Experience Pack
1000.19053.1000.0
-- Ian
-----Original Message-----
From: bug-gnubg-bounces+ian.shaw=riverauto.co.uk@gnu.org
<bug-gnubg-bounces+ian.shaw=riverauto.co.uk@gnu.org> On Behalf Of Isaac Keslassy
Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2024 7:13 AM
To: bug-gnubg@gnu.org
Subject: Re: GNUbg version 1.08.001 available
1) SAVING SETTINGS: I have also had the problem of gnubg 1.08 not saving
settings, or rather, reporting that it is saving them but not loading them.
Reinstalling gnubg doesn't help. It only worked for me once I selected to
remove all of my preferences during the installation process (you need to make
sacrifices to help debug!). I noticed in the faulty installation that I had
both a ".gnubgautorc" and a "gnubgautorc" file in my preferences folder. This
may be the reason: it may save in one file and read from the other. I tried to
correct the error in gnubg.c, but cannot do it due to the 2nd problem below:
2) WINDOWS COMPILATION: I cannot compile and run gnubg 1.08 on Windows using
MSYS2. Once compiled, gnubg cannot open any of its needed files (MET, weights,
textures, etc). Jon kindly helped and encountered the same issue on his
computer. He mentioned it could be an issue with g_fopen. Any idea anyone?
On 10-Feb-24 11:56 PM, Murat K wrote:
> On 2/9/2024 10:59 PM, Murat K wrote:
>
>> It replaced my gnubgautorc with a default file. I installed it on
>> another computer to make sure. It did the same thing. Is this
>> intentional? What is the fix to use my previous settings??
>
> I had never installed 1_08_dev-20240103. I tried it and it does the
> same thing. Interesting that nobody else noticed or complained about
> this. I went back to 1_08_dev-20230709 and all is fine. I guess I'll
> just have to do without the latest and greatest improvements... ;)
>
> MK
>
> External e-mail, be judicious when opening attachments or links
- Re: GNUbg version 1.08.001 available, (continued)
- Re: GNUbg version 1.08.001 available, Isaac Keslassy, 2024/02/11
- Problems with gnubg's saved settings, Philippe Michel, 2024/02/11
- Re: Problems with gnubg's saved settings, Murat K, 2024/02/11
- Re: Problems with gnubg's saved settings, MK, 2024/02/12
- Re: Problems with gnubg's saved settings, EDWARD GOLDBERG, 2024/02/12
- Re: Problems with gnubg's saved settings, EDWARD GOLDBERG, 2024/02/12
- Re: Problems with gnubg's saved settings, EDWARD GOLDBERG, 2024/02/12
- Re: Problems with gnubg's saved settings, EDWARD GOLDBERG, 2024/02/12
- Re: Problems with gnubg's saved settings, EDWARD GOLDBERG, 2024/02/12
- Re: Problems with gnubg's saved settings, EDWARD GOLDBERG, 2024/02/12
- RE: GNUbg version 1.08.001 available,
Ian Shaw <=
Re: GNUbg version 1.08.001 available, TAKAHASHI Kaoru, 2024/02/12