[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Interesting question/experiment about value of cube ownership
From: |
Ian Shaw |
Subject: |
RE: Interesting question/experiment about value of cube ownership |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Mar 2024 13:44:51 +0000 |
MK: Even though I think most of you won't absorb what I wrote above, because
you all "divinely believe" in the current "cube skill theory", I won't consider
it a total waste of my time even if it sows a seed of doubt in just one mind.
I don’t "divinely believe" in the current cube theory. I understand the maths
behind it. If you have found errors in the maths, then I would be glad to
re-evaluate.
Let's find out where you disagree by starting from the beginning. What is your
analysis of the basic 25% takepoint calculation?
-- Ian
- RE: Interesting question/experiment about value of cube ownership, (continued)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Fwd: Interesting question/experiment about value of cube ownership, Ian Shaw, 2024/03/16
- Re: Interesting question/experiment about value of cube ownership, Murat K, 2024/03/18
- RE: Interesting question/experiment about value of cube ownership, Ian Shaw, 2024/03/19
- Re: Interesting question/experiment about value of cube ownership, MK, 2024/03/28
- Re: Interesting question/experiment about value of cube ownership, Ian Shaw, 2024/03/31
- RE: Interesting question/experiment about value of cube ownership, Ian Shaw, 2024/03/19
- Re: Interesting question/experiment about value of cube ownership, MK, 2024/03/28
- RE: Interesting question/experiment about value of cube ownership,
Ian Shaw <=
- Re: Interesting question/experiment about value of cube ownership, MK, 2024/03/28
- Re: Interesting question/experiment about value of cube ownership, Ian Shaw, 2024/03/31
- Backgammon "starting position" and how GnuBG handles it., Murat K, 2024/03/19