Results of my 7 "fartoffski formulae" mutant vs GnuBG cube skill experiments.

[Murat K]

In my 7 mutant cube skill experiments based on my fartoffski "game stages" 
formulae, the
results of a total of 101,000 games were as follows:

EXPERIMENT 11: Mutant won 51.51% of games, 45.73% of points in 20,000 games vs 
GnuBG 2-ply

EXPERIMENT 12: Mutant won 52.50% of games, 47.51% of points in 20,000 games vs 
GnuBG 2-ply

EXPERIMENT 14-a: Mutant won 49.38% of games, 47.46% of points in 20,000 games 
vs GnuBG 3-ply

EXPERIMENT 14-b: Mutant won 49.40% of games, 47.80% of points in 1,000 games vs 
GnuBG 4-ply

EXPERIMENT 14-c1: Mutant won 49.94% of games, 48.19% of points in 10,000 games 
vs GnuBG 3-ply

EXPERIMENT 14-c2: Mutant won 49.81% of games, 47.49% of points in 10,000 games 
vs GnuBG 3-ply

EXPERIMENT 14-d: Mutant won 49.57% of games, 47.30% of points in 20,000 games 
vs GnuBG 2-ply

My mutant is not better then GnuBG (yet;) but good enough for me to enjoy 
mocking at the much
hyped and dogmatized jackoffski cube formulae of the gamblegammon world. :)

You can see the descriptions, Python scripts, game logs and my tabulated 
analyses at my web site:

https://montanaonline.net/backgammon/py2.php

While at it, look (if you hadn't before) at my older Murat vs bots experiments 
from the main page:

https://montanaonline.net/backgammon/index.php

and my other mutant vs GnuBG experiment from the "Deforming the cube skill 
dogmatism" page:

https://montanaonline.net/backgammon/py.php

MK