[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Move filters
From: |
Ian Shaw |
Subject: |
RE: Move filters |
Date: |
Mon, 15 Jul 2024 11:32:04 +0000 |
Here is a link to Extreme Gammon where it tabulates the results and includes XG2
https://www.extremegammon.com/studies.aspx
-----Original Message-----
From: bug-gnubg-bounces+ian.shaw=riverauto.co.uk@gnu.org
<bug-gnubg-bounces+ian.shaw=riverauto.co.uk@gnu.org> On Behalf Of Philippe
Michel
Sent: Tuesday, July 9, 2024 9:14 PM
To: Joseph Heled <jheled@gmail.com>
Cc: bug-gnubg@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Move filters
On Mon, Jul 08, 2024 at 01:36:46PM +1200, Joseph Heled wrote:
> I see (in the article) GNUbg 2-ply: 33.24 Is that what we are
> comparing to? 16.74 is half.
> Are you saying GNU got that much better?
Yes, error rates are approximately halved:
0ply
chequer play cost -44.50
cube play cost -11.67
1ply
chequer play cost -31.98
cube play cost -8.58
2ply wc
chequer play cost -16.74
cube play cost -4.42
2ply supremo
chequer play cost -16.11
cube play cost -4.42
3ply
chequer play cost -12.66
cube play cost -3.80
4ply
chequer play cost -9.29
cube play cost -3.51