Re: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 ply checker and cube ratings

[Murat K]

On 8/20/2024 5:55 AM, Richard Buckle wrote:

It should not be surprising if your consistently snide and

insulting tone makes others reluctant to engage with you.

    The saying used to go like "you don't shoot the messenger
    just because you don't like the message".
    
    Now we have to say "you don't shoot the message just
    because you don't like the messenger"...
    
    If you had nothing to say on the subject itself, why did you
    bother to reply..?

I shall now be adding you to my block list,

    You could have done this quietly without announcing it to
    me and to the entire forum. Do you know why you may
    have felt a need to broadcast it? Do some research. Ask
    your psychologist...

and I suspect I am not the first to do so.

    I suspect so also. But you are doing this to find strength
    in numbers. What is you are the first one to do so? Think
    about it...
    
    And then, what if you are the 100th to do so? What took
    you so long? Think about this also...

On 20 Aug 2024, at 10:18, Murat K <playbg-rgb@yahoo.com> wrote:

 Nobody no sabe nada..? ¡Ay, caramba!

Pretty sad for all you who take bot strengths
sooo damn seriously in every other way... :(

On 8/17/2024 2:07 AM, Murat K wrote:

I have been looking for any info on the relative strengths
of the 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 ply checker and cube levels but so far I
couldn't find anything. Can anyone answer here or point
to a link for this kind of info as Elo, ppg, probabilities of
winning, etc. either separately for checker and cube or
combined? Thanks.

MK