[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: getdate don't need alloca
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: getdate don't need alloca |
Date: |
Sat, 18 Dec 2004 16:38:04 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5 |
Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Bruno Haible <address@hidden> writes:
> > Look at the .c file that is generated by bison (ca. version 1.30).
>
> FYI, getdate.y doesn't work with bison <= 1.35.
OK, then let's look at the output of a recent bison version, say 1.875e.
# ifdef YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA
# if YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA
# define YYSTACK_ALLOC alloca
# endif
# else
# if defined (alloca) || defined (_ALLOCA_H)
# define YYSTACK_ALLOC alloca
# else
# ifdef __GNUC__
# define YYSTACK_ALLOC __builtin_alloca
# endif
# endif
# endif
This means, if <alloca.h> exists as a header file, the bison generated code
expects it to be #included by the .y file.
It also means, if alloca is not defined as a macro but rather as a compiler
built-in, or as a library function without an <alloca.h> file, the bison
generated code expects YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA to be defined to 1 by the .y file.
So I would suggest this patch:
*** getdate.y 8 Dec 2004 22:25:43 -0000 1.91
--- getdate.y 18 Dec 2004 15:38:51 -0000
***************
*** 37,42 ****
--- 37,46 ----
#include "getdate.h"
#include <alloca.h>
+ /* Tell the bison-generated code when alloca() should be used. */
+ #if HAVE_ALLOCA
+ # define YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA 1
+ #endif
/* Since the code of getdate.y is not included in the Emacs executable
itself, there is no need to #define static in this file. Even if
- Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: getdate don't need alloca, (continued)
- Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: getdate don't need alloca, Paul Eggert, 2004/12/17
- [bug-gnulib] Re: getdate don't need alloca, Simon Josefsson, 2004/12/17
- Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: getdate don't need alloca, Paul Eggert, 2004/12/18
- [bug-gnulib] Re: getdate don't need alloca, Bruno Haible, 2004/12/18
- [bug-gnulib] Re: getdate don't need alloca, Simon Josefsson, 2004/12/18
- Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: getdate don't need alloca, Paul Eggert, 2004/12/19
- [bug-gnulib] Re: getdate don't need alloca, Simon Josefsson, 2004/12/19
- Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: getdate don't need alloca, Bruno Haible, 2004/12/21
- Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: getdate don't need alloca, Paul Eggert, 2004/12/22
[bug-gnulib] Re: getdate don't need alloca, Simon Josefsson, 2004/12/17
- Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: getdate don't need alloca,
Bruno Haible <=
- Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: getdate don't need alloca, Stepan Kasal, 2004/12/20
- Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: getdate don't need alloca, Stepan Kasal, 2004/12/20
- Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: getdate don't need alloca, Paul Eggert, 2004/12/20
- Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: getdate don't need alloca, Stepan Kasal, 2004/12/21
- Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: getdate don't need alloca, Paul Eggert, 2004/12/22