[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: size_max
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: size_max |
Date: |
Thu, 20 Jan 2005 16:39:21 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
Simon Josefsson <address@hidden> writes:
> +Include:
Instead of being empty, shouldn't the Include: section look like this?
Otherwise, SIZE_MAX won't be defined on some platforms.
#include <limits.h>
#if HAVE_STDINT_H
#include <stdint.h>
#endif
Admittedly this is a bit of a hassle. Perhaps we should add
a new file lib/size_max.h that contains the above code?
> +License:
> +LGPL
There's no LGPL'ed code in the proposed module. It's licensed under
these terms:
This file is free software; the Free Software Foundation
gives unlimited permission to copy and/or distribute it,
with or without modifications, as long as this notice is preserved.
How about if we change the "License:" field to read "Preserve-notice",
or something nice little phrase like that?
Or, if we add a new file lib/size_max.h along the lines suggested
above, then perhaps we can just keep it LGPLed. That might be simpler
than adding a new value to the License: field.
> +Maintainer:
> +Simon Josefsson
Shouldn't Bruno be the maintainer? He wrote all the code.
(Unless "Maintainer" means "maintainer of the module file" ....)
- [bug-gnulib] Re: size_max, Simon Josefsson, 2005/01/20
- Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: size_max,
Paul Eggert <=
- [bug-gnulib] Re: size_max, Simon Josefsson, 2005/01/21
- [bug-gnulib] Re: size_max, Simon Josefsson, 2005/01/21
- [bug-gnulib] Re: size_max, Paul Eggert, 2005/01/21
- [bug-gnulib] Re: size_max, Simon Josefsson, 2005/01/21
- Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: size_max, Stepan Kasal, 2005/01/22
- [bug-gnulib] Re: size_max, Simon Josefsson, 2005/01/22