[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [bug-gnulib] New GNULIB glob module?
From: |
Derek Price |
Subject: |
Re: [bug-gnulib] New GNULIB glob module? |
Date: |
Tue, 17 May 2005 14:37:00 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Paul Eggert wrote:
>First, already we have something bogus: that __BEGIN_DECLS. It must
>be protected by "#ifdef _LIBC", since random C environments don't have
>it. Similarly for __END_DECLS.
Done.
>The simplest fix would be to do something like this:
>
>#if defined _LIBC || HAVE_SYS_CDEFS_H
># include <sys/cdefs.h>
>#endif
>
>with the appropriate change to glob.m4.
Actually, this change doesn't appear to be necessary once I protect the
__BEGIN_DECLS and __END_DECLS stuff.
I've removed the #include of <sys/types.h>.
>But let's step back a second. Why are we worried about building
>gnulib glob.c under glibc? It will never happen, right? So perhaps
>we needn't worry about this problem at all.
Won't it? I thought the idea was that when you and I settled on
something that looked good I would attempt to send it back to the libc
folks so that the files wouldn't need to be maintained separately. So
far, our work contains at the least some cleanup, a bug fix, and an
efficiency improvement that should be useful in libc.
>With that in mind, how about if we simply remove those #undef's? If
>the problem recurs we can put them back in again.
Done.
Patch still delayed until I'm done with my email.
Regards,
Derek
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFCijnMLD1OTBfyMaQRAklUAKDo25YXS7Hk5kqlYe1AzXICeBBLfwCfahXg
oD3soIvk5Shqw50Mfm4dgRY=
=/2W5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Re: [bug-gnulib] New GNULIB glob module?, (continued)
- Re: [bug-gnulib] New GNULIB glob module?, Derek Price, 2005/05/13
- Re: [bug-gnulib] New GNULIB glob module?, Paul Eggert, 2005/05/13
- Re: [bug-gnulib] New GNULIB glob module?, Paul Eggert, 2005/05/14
- Re: [bug-gnulib] New GNULIB glob module?, Derek Price, 2005/05/16
- Re: [bug-gnulib] New GNULIB glob module?, Paul Eggert, 2005/05/15
- Re: [bug-gnulib] New GNULIB glob module?, Derek Price, 2005/05/17
- Re: [bug-gnulib] New GNULIB glob module?, Derek Price, 2005/05/17
- Re: [bug-gnulib] New GNULIB glob module?, Paul Eggert, 2005/05/14
- Re: [bug-gnulib] New GNULIB glob module?, Derek Price, 2005/05/15
- Re: [bug-gnulib] New GNULIB glob module?, Paul Eggert, 2005/05/16
- Re: [bug-gnulib] New GNULIB glob module?,
Derek Price <=
- Re: [bug-gnulib] New GNULIB glob module?, Paul Eggert, 2005/05/18
- Re: [bug-gnulib] New GNULIB glob module?, Derek Price, 2005/05/18
- Re: [bug-gnulib] New GNULIB glob module?, Paul Eggert, 2005/05/15
- Re: [bug-gnulib] New GNULIB glob module?, Derek Price, 2005/05/15
- Re: [bug-gnulib] New GNULIB glob module?, Paul Eggert, 2005/05/17
- Re: [bug-gnulib] New GNULIB glob module?, Derek Price, 2005/05/17
- Re: [bug-gnulib] New GNULIB glob module?, Derek Price, 2005/05/20
- Re: [bug-gnulib] New GNULIB glob module?, Paul Eggert, 2005/05/23
- Re: [bug-gnulib] New GNULIB glob module?, Derek Price, 2005/05/24
- Re: [bug-gnulib] New GNULIB glob module?, Paul Eggert, 2005/05/24