[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug-gnulib] ullong_max vs. stdint.h/inttypes.h
From: |
Eric Blake |
Subject: |
[bug-gnulib] ullong_max vs. stdint.h/inttypes.h |
Date: |
Fri, 27 May 2005 07:24:03 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Right now, only the fts module depends on ULLONG_MAX in the ullong_max
module, and uses it only to generate its own PRIuMAX macro if <inttypes.h>
didn't. But stdint.h (and gnulib stdint_.h) defines UINTMAX_MAX, which
does the same thing as ULLONG_MAX is trying to do. Should fts be
simplified to just use stdint.h/inttypes.h? And should there be an
inttypes_.h module for systems lacking the PRI* macros?
- --
Life is short - so eat dessert first!
Eric Blake address@hidden
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (Cygwin)
Comment: Public key at home.comcast.net/~ericblake/eblake.gpg
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFClx9y84KuGfSFAYARAn8lAJ0cFL8lIp4T45TV57MFodlvNUmqnQCgiSoa
PzoNEF6n6LQBwE/FItsrGDk=
=ROrS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- [bug-gnulib] ullong_max vs. stdint.h/inttypes.h,
Eric Blake <=