[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: glob_.h & glibc
From: |
Derek Price |
Subject: |
Re: glob_.h & glibc |
Date: |
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 09:23:26 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) |
Paul Eggert wrote:
>OK, but in that case shouldn't the AC_REQUIRE([AC_GNU_SOURCE]) be in
>gl_GLOB rather than gl_PREREQ_GLOB?
>
>
I don't think so. gl_GLOB tests for the _GNU_GLOB_INTERFACE_VERSION
macro from <gnu-versions.h> & a known bug in GNU glob's POSIX support.
Neither requires the GNU extensions enabled.
Also, gl_GLOB_SUBSTITUTE can enable the glob module without a call to
gl_GLOB at all, so at the least, a call to AC_REQUIRE([AC_GNU_SOURCE])
would still need to remain in gl_GLOB_PREREQ.
Regards,
Derek
--
Derek R. Price
CVS Solutions Architect
Ximbiot <http://ximbiot.com>
v: +1 717.579.6168
f: +1 717.234.3125
<mailto:address@hidden>
- glob_.h & glibc, Derek Price, 2005/09/08
- Re: glob_.h & glibc, Paul Eggert, 2005/09/08
- Re: glob_.h & glibc, Derek Price, 2005/09/09
- Re: glob_.h & glibc, Derek Price, 2005/09/09
- Re: glob_.h & glibc, Paul Eggert, 2005/09/09
- Re: glob_.h & glibc, Derek Price, 2005/09/09
- Re: glob_.h & glibc, Paul Eggert, 2005/09/09
- Re: glob_.h & glibc, Derek Price, 2005/09/11
- Re: glob_.h & glibc, Paul Eggert, 2005/09/12
- Re: glob_.h & glibc,
Derek Price <=